11/14/2022 0 Comments Critique of pure reason![]() The Nurse-Family Partnerships program, founded by David Olds, has produced rigorously examined, impressive results. The Circle of Security program has measurably improved attachments and enhanced social skills. #CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON SERIES#These programs usually involve having nurses or mature women make a series of home visits to give young mothers the sort of cajoling and practical wisdom that in other times would have been delivered by grandmothers or elders. The question, of course, is, What can government do about any of this? The answer is that there are programs that do work to help young and stressed mothers establish healthier attachments. Students from less stimulating environments have worse language skills. On the other hand, as Martha Farah of the University of Pennsylvania has found, students who do not feel emotionally safe tend not to develop good memories (which is consistent with cortisol experiments in animals). They grow up to become more productive workers. They’re more resilient in the face of setbacks. Research over the past few decades impressively shows that children who emerge from attentive, attuned parental relationships do better in school and beyond. They’ll note that if we want to have successful human capital policies, we have to get over the definition of education as something that takes place in schools between the hours of 8 and 3, between the months of September and June, and between the ages of 5 and 18.Īs Bob Marvin of the University of Virginia points out, there is a mountain of evidence demonstrating that early childhood attachments shape lifelong learning competence. These candidates will point out that powerful social trends - the doubling of single-parent families over the past generation, the rise of divorce rates - mean that government has to rethink its role. #CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON HOW TO#These candidates will emphasize that education is a cumulative process that begins at the dawn of life and builds early in life as children learn how to learn. They will understand that schools filled with students who can’t control their impulses, who can’t focus their attention and who can’t regulate their emotions will not succeed, no matter how many reforms are made by governors, superintendents or presidents. They will talk, as Cameron did, about the mushy things, like love and attachment, and will say, as Cameron did, “Family relationships matter more than anything else.” The creative ones will give speeches like the one David Cameron, who is reviving the British Tory party, gave last month. The conventional candidates will give the same old education reform speeches, trumpeting this or that bureaucratic reshuffle. The creative ones will finally absorb the truth found in decades of research: the relationships children have outside school shape their performance inside the school. They will speak of education as if children were blank slates waiting to have ideas inputted into their brains with some efficient delivery mechanism. The conventional ones, though they don’t know it, are prisoners of the dead husk of behaviorism. The creative ones will talk about improving the lives of students. The conventional ones will talk about improving the schools. All the presidential candidates this year will talk about education. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |